What are Central Counterparties (CCPs)?

News and insights from Global Custody Pro

In partnership with

Good morning. Today we continue our series on market infrastructures with a look at Central Counterparties (CCPs). Each Wednesday we will share an article about the global custody industry and its complex value chain. Each Friday we share a roundup of key industry news and insights.

What is Clearing?

Clearing is a step in a trade transaction that happens in between a trade being executed on an exchange, and being settled in a securities settlement system and book entry settlement occurring at a Central Securities Depository.

Clearing bridges trade execution and settlement in markets through specialized institutions managing post-trade obligations between buyers and sellers. It transforms bilateral relationships into a centralized structure, replacing counterparty exposure with a well-capitalized clearing house.

The clearing house becomes buyer to every seller and seller to every buyer through novation. This creates two new contracts from the original trade, each backed by the clearing house's credit standing and risk framework, protecting participants from default risk.

Clearing covers trade validation, position management, collateral handling, and default risk management. Through standardization, clearing houses reduce operational complexity and maintain stability during market stress.

Start learning AI in 2025

Everyone talks about AI, but no one has the time to learn it. So, we found the easiest way to learn AI in as little time as possible: The Rundown AI.

It's a free AI newsletter that keeps you up-to-date on the latest AI news, and teaches you how to apply it in just 5 minutes a day.

Plus, complete the quiz after signing up and they’ll recommend the best AI tools, guides, and courses – tailored to your needs.

How Clearing Works Across Markets

Equities

Post-trade clearing activates after stock trades, with the clearing house guaranteeing transaction completion. High trading volumes and quick settlement needs demand robust clearing mechanisms.

Clearing houses validate trades, verify collateral, and net positions across trades and counterparties. Netting cuts security and cash transfer volume, boosting efficiency and lowering costs. This enables one net payment for cash and securities to occur instead of millions of combinations every settlement day.

Standardized procedures maintain market integrity and support exchange operations. During times of high market volatility, the clearing house's resources and risk frameworks prevent default contagion. Global custody providers are key players in this value chain.

Foreign Exchange

Source: CME

FX clearing splits between spot and derivative transactions. Spot FX uses bilateral settlement, with banks handling counterparty risks through services like CLS Bank for payment-versus-payment settlement.

FX derivatives clear through central counterparties due to regulations and risk management needs. These require specific handling of cross-currency risks, margin calculations, and default procedures for 24-hour global markets.

Post-2008, FX clearing evolved with specialized services for different instruments. Clearing houses adapt as market structure shifts and new products emerge.

Derivatives

Derivatives demand complex clearing due to long contract durations and price movement risks. Clearing houses like CME and ICE run risk models covering multiple factors, correlations, and future exposures.

Daily mark-to-market, initial and variation margin collection, and default fund maintenance protect against extreme scenarios. This prevents member defaults from threatening clearing house stability.

Clearing houses balance prudent risk management with efficient capital use. Their frameworks maintain market integrity and smooth derivatives market operation.

The Role of CCPs

CCPs eliminate bilateral credit risk by placing themselves between trades, creating a hub-spoke model that reduces market interconnectedness. They transform complex trading webs into streamlined relationships managed through standardized processes and risk controls.

CCPs collect margins, maintain default funds, and set membership standards to protect market stability. Their multilateral netting cuts overall exposures and settlement obligations, while standardized risk management lowers operational burdens across members.

Post-2008 regulations strengthened CCPs' role as risk managers, requiring enhanced capital, stress testing, and transparency. This evolution cemented their position as critical market infrastructure while demanding stronger safeguards against their own failure.

Digital Assets and Clearing

Digital asset markets currently operate through diverse clearing models, from centralized exchanges acting as custodians to decentralized protocols using smart contracts. Traditional CCPs are exploring blockchain solutions while maintaining needed risk controls and regulatory compliance.

Crypto clearing faces unique challenges including 24/7 trading, instant settlement expectations, and cross-border complexity. Because digital assets can settle instantly with no intermediaries, there are big changes in the landscape of market infrastructures ahead as more assets move on-chain.

Security, custody, and settlement finality remain key concerns as markets develop hybrid solutions. Integration with traditional financial infrastructure requires balancing innovation with proven risk management practices.

Benefits and Risks of Central Counterparties

Benefits

CCPs reduce counterparty risk through collateral management and default protections. Their standardized processes cut operational costs while multilateral netting improves capital efficiency.

Central clearing brings transparency through position reporting and uniform risk management. This visibility helps regulators monitor systemic risks while giving members clarity about their position vs the clearing house.

Market stability improves through consistent margin practices and default management procedures. CCPs' financial resources and risk frameworks are designed to prevent isolated defaults from spreading market-wide.

Risks

Risk concentration in CCPs creates potential single points of failure requiring robust safeguards. Their interconnectedness means problems could quickly spread through financial markets.

Procyclical margin requirements may strain member liquidity resources during stress periods. High membership costs and operational demands can limit market access and concentrate risk among fewer participants.

Operational failures or cyber attacks could disrupt critical market functions. Complex default management may struggle with unprecedented market conditions or multiple member defaults.

Key Takeaways

  • Clearing transforms bilateral risk into centrally managed exposure

  • CCPs provide standardized risk management across markets

  • Different asset classes require tailored clearing approaches

  • Digital assets present new clearing challenges and opportunities

  • Post-2008 reforms strengthened clearing while raising operating costs

  • Market stability depends on CCP resilience and risk management

  • Integration between traditional and digital markets demands innovation

What’s next?

Next week, our markets infrastructure series will continue with a look at Securities Settlement Systems. Understanding how these various components interact is crucial for grasping the value chain that underpins the global custody industry. We encourage you to share any specific aspects of market infrastructure you'd like us to explore in future discussions.

Did you enjoy today's newsletter?

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.